For some bizarre reason, I am obsessed with archeology and history as it applies to the Old Testament. I’ve tried to figure it out, but frankly, lost interest in the reasons. Perhaps it supports my real obsession with the psychology of motivation. Tonight, I started a recent Nat Geo issue that was entirely dedicated to Biblical history. The first section, logically, is dedicated to the Pentateuch. I’d never really read the story in such a condensed arrangement. Taking out much of the text truly simplified the message and my wanna-be-psychologist-in-training mind went to work on it.

Taking the theology out of the Adam and Eve text leaves the “forbidden fruit” analogy. Consider for a moment the number of ways humans navigate that particular conundrum. It doesn’t have to be anything as destructive as an illicit affair. In fact, it’s often something as small as cheating on a diet with a piece of chocolate. One, little bite. What can it hurt, right?

When I began writing this piece two days ago, it was poised to follow an entirely different path. But a few things happened yesterday that have inspired me to change tack. In the world before the internet, biting that forbidden fruit affected a microcosm. Today, it can affect that entire globe in a matter of seconds. The biggest problem with the sin of that bite is that once you taste, you cannot untaste, and you are always searching to repeat that initial experience. Religion assumes an immediate and swift addiction to the vice, whatever it may be. Can’t put the horse back in the barn, so to speak. The lesson In the Biblical text is in avoiding retribution by avoiding the temptation entirely, but that is entirely unrealistic. There is infinite fun in forbidden fruit, no matter how small the temptation is.

So, where does avoidance because of consequence end and humanity begin?

Over the last two days, I have witnessed a level of trolling that I could not imagine was possible. I have wondered, over the last few years watching the trend unfold, why it is so easy for people to take up trolling as a habit and in some cases, a vocation. I have concluded that it is the ultimate in forbidden fruit. The first taste is just a simple negative comment, tolerated by someone so stunned by its appearance that they don’t know how to respond, or avoid responding. Once a single opportunity has been successful, the next opportunity will require a more powerful reaction to provide the payoff. And so on, and so on, like a digital Breck commercial.

What I cannot assimilate, perhaps because I don’t share the predatory nature that seems to haunt trollers, is how anyone can exist in such a negative space. I have often watched people whose aspect is persistently negative and wondered how exhausted the must consistently be. It takes effort to be negative.

The second law of thermodynamics states that energy can neither be created or lost in the universe. It must convert from one form to another. The same is true for psychological energy. If one takes that first bite of negativity, perhaps by psychologically bullying another person, and the need for attention is fed, then another bite will be required. And then another. But it’s all negative energy, and a lot of it.

I have surmised that it is the yin and yang of humanity that allows, and sometimes fosters, the predatory nature that is the troll. The only way to remove that negative psychology from the human race is to avoid creating a human that thrives on negative energy. I didn’t think it was possible until very recently for people to actually find not only gratification, but inspiration, in creating anxiety in others, while hiding behind the veil of the internet. In order to solve this puzzle, the first question is, when and where was the first bite? The second is, when does one’s own humanity arise to self govern?

I believe that is why religion is such an important construct for many people. Humanity as a whole needs a moral compass and regardless what one calls his or her compass (God, Yahweh, Allah, the universe, the self, etc), it is a set of rules that keeps us from wanting to harm others. We have to believe that there IS some consequence, and that that consequence is a line we are not willing to cross. For each person, that line is transient. As soon as it’s crossed, if there is no consequence, it is easier to cross the next time. There has to also be a recognition of the consequence. Someone who cheats on his or her diet doesn’t experience an immediate consequence (unless the diet solves a severe health issue like diabetes). Sadly, there is no consequence for trolling that is severe enough to inhibit a troll from continuing his or her destructive behavior. The consequence would require limiting free speech for the rest of the world, and that is a much bigger problem.

So, as I sit here and watch many of my writer and photographer friends – and of course some public figures – suffer a level of trolling that I consider criminal, I wonder at which point those people begin to feel their humanity slipping away. At what point does he or she squelch that predatory behavior in favor of improving human relations? At what point does the internal compass activate? Does it ever? Are trolls doomed to live in that negative space forever without an equal and opposing force, and what is that force? I have to wonder as well is my humanity a product of the moral compass provided by the living Catholic environment in which I spent my formative years, or am I (not I specifically, but I, the individual) genetically predisposed to kindness and moderation? 

10 thoughts on “Temptation

  1. “Humanity as a whole needs a moral compass and regardless what one calls his or her compass (God, Yahweh, Allah, the universe, etc), it is a set of rules that keeps us from wanting to harm others.”

    Please don’t think of me as a troll, but what you wrote makes it sound as if one must believe in some sort of deity in order to have a moral compass. The implication in that statement is that those who don’t believe in the existence of any sort of supernatural deity — atheists, for example — have no moral compass, nothing to prevent t hem from wanting to harm others.

    As an atheist, I couldn’t disagree more. I follow a set of rules that I have learned from my parents, from my teachers, and from society in general. The “rule” that I follow is the Golden Rule. Treat others as I would like to be treated. Behave toward others as I would like them to behave toward me. I also follow the rules set up by the laws of the land, recognizing that they, too, have consequences in the event I would do harm to others and get caught having done so.

    So I’m not sure if you meant to imply that atheists lack morals; I hope that’s not what you intended. But if it was, I have to express my disagreement, but I am doing so in a respectful manner (I believe).


    1. Actually, I’m implying the opposite. I believe people in general have a moral compass, and that IS their humanity. I’ll have to clarify that in the text. However, I’ve known people who cannot maintain reasonable behavior (control addictions, abuse, etc) without turning to religion. And I should also clarify that I don’t mean to include reasonable criticism in my definition of bullying. I’ve watched bullies escalate their behavior. I’ve been on the receiving end. All the while I wonder what happened to their compass at the moment when it should engage.

      And perhaps it’s irony, but every atheist I know is peaceful, loving, kind and a loyal friend. When I referred to calling one’s compass the universe it is because of my atheistic friends, to a one they see the universe as a powerful source of positive or negative energy.

      And thanks for the respectful question. It forced me to clarified some important points.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Thanks for your response. Maybe I’m being overly sensitive, since I’ve been told by many Christians that, as an atheist, I have no moral compass and I can’t distinguish right from wrong or good from bad because, without God, there is no such thing as objective morality. So if I misinterpreted your words, I apologize.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Not at all. It’s a fair response, considering what you’ve heard from Christians in the past. I find it interesting that many Christians have lost sight of the fact that Christ, the ultimate hippy, repeatedly said the same thing: “love thy neighbor as thyself,” “don’t judge, that’s my job” and “stop killing people in my name.” Yet, those themes seem to be ever present in the context of religion (as opposed to faith). I also believe that because religion is a human construct, it is inherently flawed. The only real connection to the moral compass is a faith in our own humanity, whether one ascribes that humanity to God is irrelevant. I don’t need a consequence to keep me from hurting another human; it’s just there. It is exactly the same compass that creates in me a disdain for bullying of any kind, including trolling.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. My belief is that trolls are narcissists. Their psychosis began in childhood and so before trolling ever became a thing for them. They live in a constant state of negativity anyway – they thrive on sharing it. Negative attention IS a reward to them since it is a level of comfort and is probably what they grew up knowing from a parent. A true narcissist can only understand humanity on an intellectual level; compassion is either flawed or non-existent. And so the golden rule, coming from any religion or philosophy, is null.
    Great post. 🙂 I enjoyed the way you worked through this and the questions you ask have made me think more outside of the box.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. These are people that are broken, at least partly. Sometimes a life unfulfilled, that they blame their emptiness on something or someone else.

    Good thing, on WordPress, you get the IP address of a troll’s comment. On twitter, you can block or mute. But these solutions don’t solve the problem.

    You can kill bullies with kindness…but I’m not sure how that works.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. It takes a LOT of kindness, if they’re not narcissists. If they’re pathologically negative, then they’re missing that internal governor that most people have. I don’t think there’s much you can do about that.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.